One Misguided Spark of Inspiration

Our march through the Top Ten Disney Theme Park Controversies (T.T.D.T.P.C.) continues as we cross the midway point with #5.

Click HERE to cath up with the first 5 entries.

5) Bye-Bye Figment:

One little spark of inspiration is at the heart of all creation… so goes the catchy tune that served as the theme song not only for Epcot’s Journey Into Imagination pavilion but in many ways also for all of Disney in the 1980s. It is upbeat, optimistic and eminently hummable. Yet despite the broadly loved song and the royal purple dragon (the aforementioned Figment) who sang it, someone within Disney had a very different type of inspiration and decided to remove both the song and the singer in 1998.


Bright and optimistic was replaced by dark and insulting

In 1999 an all-new version of the attraction opened, creatively titled “Journey into YOUR Imagination”. In this version guests entered “The Imagination Institute” which was a tie-in with the 3-D movie Honey I Shrunk the Audience. After boarding ride vehicles (now red instead of the original purple), guests were scanned and immediately insulted (the scanner states that the entire audience had no imagination whatsoever). Visitors then proceeded through a series of dark rooms featuring rudimentary optical and aural illusions. These basic tricks were said to energize guests’ imaginations until the final scene, when they were scanned once again and found so full of creativity that the machine exploded with light and sound. Figment, his human partner Dreamfinder, and all the original music were absent (save for a few throwaway cameos from Figment).


Hit the road, Jack

Fans were seriously outraged. Figment and Dreamfinder were not only beloved characters but also the faces of Epcot. They were original creations of the park and managed to gain such popularity that they grew beyond being simply a ride or even park mascots and stood shoulder to shoulder with some of Disney’s most famous creations. Figment and Dreamfinder plush dolls, key chains, picture frames and merchandise of all sorts flew off the store shelves; Figment was a star. Yet in a move nearly on par with the New Coke debacle Disney decided to remove them both, erasing them from memory.


Still selling the Figment merch

Perhaps even worse was the fact that what replaced the attraction was a shallow shell of the original. The new ride was considerably shorter and much less grand than the original (a ride many considered one of Disney’s best). The changes did not stop with the ride itself either. In what is still one of the most head-scratching moves Disney has ever done, the Image Works — a playground of sorts located on the second floor of the pavilion — was shuttered. Here guests could explore sight, sound, touch and other creative elements using interactive exhibits. Dreamfinder and Figment were featured in many of these installations and acted as your hosts and cheerleaders. It was a fun, immersive experience that was especially well suited to young kids. Today the stairs sit roped off and the second floor still has many of the exhibits rotting in place, unused for many years.


Now both are gone…

Though this happened prior to social media, enough people complained online and via mail that Disney was forced to take notice. In a virtually unprecedented move, they closed the attraction after just over two years and retooled it again. Fans took a deep breath of relief and some even speculated that the original ride would be recreated in a new souped-up, high tech form. It appeared as though Disney recognized their mistake and was now making it right.


One or more of these characters is now seriously annoying

In 2002 Disney joyously announced the return of Figment and re-opened the attraction. Wanting to be very clear, they named it “Journey into Imagination with Figment”. The original Journey Into Imagination had Figment and they did not feel the need to call it out in the title — but they are the marketing masters, not me. Maybe they should rename all the rides? How about “Pirates of the Caribbean with Pirates” or “The Haunted Mansion with Ghosts”?

Anyway, fans wanted Figment so here you go folks… all the Figment you possibly can handle. It was as if Disney was telling fans to go choke on Figment.


Choke on it, suckers….

Suddenly he was everywhere; in the queue, in every show scene, and in the finale he is seen a dozen times. They also added back a new version of the original song and yet Dreamfinder did not make the cut and is still MIA today. In many ways this newest version is the worst yet. It loses the one or two nice special effects of the previous version (such as a legitimately surprising ending) and replaces them with cheaply done overdoses of Figment. Figment’s existence is not explained and he is not incorporated into the attraction in any sort of organic manner. Rather he is just slapped on every show scene as a sort of unexplained pixie host / instigator. To me it is a worst of both worlds experience; the very definition of “neither here nor there”. While the second version was a travesty, the current version does little to improve upon it. Fans by and large were not thrilled by the ride, but the fact that Figment was alive and well quelled many of them.


Though the original purple color scheme was better, it still looks nice from the outside.

This is yet another example of Disney removing something that people loved and replacing it with something that was clearly inferior, smaller in scope, and less expertly executed. The original Journey into Imagination set a very high standard; it was fun, creative, optimistic, memorable and original in every way. It was replaced with a cheap, dark funhouse featuring a small handful of effects and significantly less heart than the original. It was the equivalent of a modern day special effects film (Hello Transformers)… just loud and with little reason to exist. Yet at least that second version had a few interesting visual or audio twists. In its haste to satisfy the calls for the return of Figment, Disney managed to take even those few interesting tidbits away and instead created what is in essence a cavalcade of Figment dolls mixed in with some neon paint and nonstop droning of the Imagination song. It is overkill… and who would have thought Figment drives a pick up truck and uses a human toilet… info we did not need to know.


This photo is not upsdide down… Disney thinks that will blow your mind!

Disney failed to realize that it was not actually Figment or Dreamfinder that fans missed, but rather the spirit of fun, hope, excitement and pure joy that those characters brought to the original incarnation of the pavilion. Sure, a purple dragon is great, but he can also be annoying if not presented with care and love.


Figment and Dreamfinder are still popular enough to have spin-off new comic books based on them

Today it is one of the least popular Epcot pavilions, and having lost its sponsor (Kodak) in 2010, it is likely to be renovated into something totally new sometime soon. Was this a rare win for fans or simply a way for Disney to shut them up with an inexpensive alteration? You can probably guess how I feel.

It is incredibly difficult to create an attraction on the scale of Journey into Imagination and tougher still to make it a success. It is catching lightning in a bottle. Disney was fortunate enough to have had that happen with the Imagination ride and had stellar and long-lived characters come along with it to boot… and yet still decided to rip it out… go figure.

Decide for yourself:

Click HERE for the original ride video (unfortunately edited, but the best I could find)

Click HERE for the misguided second version

or Click HERE for the current version

To see #4 click HERE

Comments (14)

  1. I just took my teenage kids on the ride and tried to explain that it really used to be a great ride. They didn’t buy it. Reading this put the current disaster of an attraction in perfect perspective. Thank you guys!

  2. Pingback: Near Misses |
  3. That rainbow light hallway was so cool. That entire second floor was so much fun you could spend an hour or two playing around and not feel like you were missing out on doing something else in the park. That is the biggest mistake I think out of all of the change because there really is no reason at all to not have that part opened. I can understand (maybe) the thought of updating a ride but just letting an entire floor sit empty blows my mind.

    The only reason to go to the Imagination building is for the jumping water fountains and maybe seeing Captain EO. I know a lot of people are over EO but I still like seeing it every other visit or so. It is still better than HIStK 3D since almost no kids now even remember that movie series, which is a shame.

    • Yup Ryan… It is hard to fathom the logic if closing the second floor.

      I hate to be cynical but I must assume it is money driven. This way they have less staff and less overhead. Additionally the exhibits were getting outdated and would have needed updating… Which takes money.

      They used to have that beautiful entry lobby area with the ride to one side and the elevator up to the image works with the stairs to the other. Now all gone.

      • Agreed, it is definitely money driven but it doesn’t seem like it would be that expensive to run that floor. 2-3 employees plus the electrical bill is what I would imagine it would take but who knows but the bean counters.

        Even the after ride stuff they have now is outdated and when we were there in May half of it wasn’t working. The sound exhibits especially.

        I’d rather have the Imagination pavilion up and running on both floors than both sides of Innovations. I think we have wandered through Innovations once, maybe twice, in the last 3 years, and haven’t done a single exhibit inside in at least 5.

        • But Inovvations is paid by the exhibitors… not by Disney. Disney frankly knows that it sucks but they don’t care because they actually profit from it regardless.

          If a big company came forth and wanted to sponsor Imagination and open up the second floor I am sure Disney would jump to it.

          I have no way of knowing what happened… Maybe Kodak for some reason did not want to keep the second floor ipen due to costs or refused to update the exhibits. It gets very complex with all the corporate sponsorship stuff which is why I kind of wish it never existed. Just build great rides and run them and make money that way.

          Alas it is what it is and now most of Future World is a mess because of it.

  4. Imagination was pretty much EVERY kids favorite Epot attraction. The original EPCOT Center was so full of optimism and wonder (something I have written about several times here) that the current muddled mess really feels sad in comparison. They will continue to add Pixar and other characters to it because they seem to think that is what people want. Four hour lines to met Anna and Elsa don’t help either… it just confirms to them that this is the type of thing fans want… but you know what? Peopel don’t knwo what they want… you need to guide them and show them. A new version of Imagination similar to the original but using modern techniques would blow the roof off the place.

  5. I was 2 years old on my first trip to WDW and Epcot was only 5 years old. My parents tell me that Journey Into Imagination was my favorite ride and figment was my favorite character. I wish I could still re-live the original ride (not just in YouTube videos but IRL!) Figment is still one of my favorite characters, and Epcot my favorite park, but I wish future world was not the shell of its former self. Bring back the wonders of life pavilion! The imagination pavilion needs serious upgrades, and Ellen’s energy adventure/ universe of energy is long overdue for an upgrade as well! And of course, I can’t stand mission space. Even green makes me feel kinda sick. Bring back horizons!

  6. The phrase “Figment uses a human toilet” totally made my day. But is his toilet paper… purple?

    I’m so glad I am old enough to have experienced the original ride, and remember it well. It was pure magic and I hope that something equal to it will someday occupy that pyramid-lidded building. You have a good point, that it’s not the characters that people miss so much, but the way the ride made them feel. I think we can say that about most of Future World at present. Right now they could dumpt the sorcerer’s hat in the Imagination ride and let guests drive Mr. Toad cars through it– that would be more fun that what we have now. At least I wouldn’t have skunk stench sprayed at me on a perpetual basis. A comment by an unhappy imagineer, one has to wonder?

    I’ll have to look into the comic book! Dreamfinder was steampunk before steampunk was cool, you know?

    • I’m not sure Steam Punk os cool anymore… but the comic is cool… and a young Dreamfinder is fun to see.

      Regarding the skunk smell what bothers me is not so much the smell but that they were too lazy to make the slot machine have multiple outcomes. Think about how much more fun it would be if you mybe got a nice smell (lavender lets say) or maybe you get the skunk smell or wet dog smell. Kids would love that… it would have been easy to do… but it is typical of this whole attraction… the bare minimum of effort and ironically imagination was used in it’s creation.
      Sure, kids will still find it pleasent… there are worse attractions… but we lost so much to get so little.

      • Am I imagining things, or did we actually discuss the randomized slot machine smell effect during WDW47? It seems very familiar to me…

        I’m also somewhat fascinated that we are halfway through, and it seems that the biggest controversies have already been taken. Well, I can think of another EPCOT one that is probably near the top of the list. It’s hard to believe that the Wand and Pooh and McDonald’s are not even in the top five. Can’t wait for the week to finish up.

        • I’m sure we probably did mention it Shane. We tended to critique and comment everything; that was half the fun!

  7. Pingback: Bear Attacks! |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *